
July 2001
One of those many ills
of the world that I plan to put right some day is the
predominance of Microsoft application software. No, let’s be
fair, it’s not a predominance, it’s a complete and total
domination of the monopolistic variety.
Microsoft will of
course argue that they have, metaphorically speaking, taken
over a diverse market of conflicting standards, and helped to
make the trains run on time by forcing everyone into the same
basic interface and file formats. But just as Benito Mussolini
was hailed by his Fascist Party followers in the Italy of the
1930s for performing the railway timetable miracle, so there
are many victims of the process of Microsoft who long to see
Bill Gates dangling upside down from a lamppost. Especially
those for whom macro viruses such as Melissa have wreaked
their havoc.
Recently, I have spent
a couple of wasted days trying to recover the consequences of
allowing my Outlook data file (outlook.pst) to grow past
2Gbyte. Well, various assorted smart arses guffaw and suggest
I am my own victim for doing such a stupid thing. But with
80Gbyte hard disks in abundance these days, the concept of
what’s a sane amount of data for something like Outlook is
rather more robust than it once was.
The really nasty bit
of this is that Outlook went on working some time after
tripping through what I know realise is the 2Gbyte barrier
before it gave clues that things were going pear shaped. So
the previous week backup file was also larger than 2Gbyte. And
the one before that… urk!
Well, of course, the
moment I wailed up stepped everyone to say “Oh THAT old
chestnut… there’s service pack 765a and hotfix 43g that
will fix this for you…”
Oh not it doesn’t.
All the fiddling on fringes of Outlook does is insert a bit of
code that watches the size of the file and warns that “you
don’t want to do that”. Microsoft itself is unflinching in
admitting that a busted outlook.pst is pretty much gone for
ever, and weakly suggests commissioning the services of data
recovery experts if it’s a really big deal. But they don’t
(as usual) offer to pick up the tab.
I eventually found a
backup that was viable (3 months earlier, and hastily set
about stripping it down to of all extraneous attachments, and
archiving away for all I was worth. But it’s a waste of
time, and the original elegance of having one big searchable
database record of email in and out became seriously
fragmented. Ugh.
Meanwhile, what of the
alternatives to MS Office? IBM has all but given up the ghost
with Lotus SmartSuite – but rightly so, I must say, it was
not a very lovable product, smothered at is was in Lotus’
legendary smarminess. And after a flourish. Sun has not kept
up the enthusiasm for Star Office that we had all hoped.
So imagine my interest
when a Press Release from Corel turned up in the outlook
inbox, announcing the arrival of WordPerfect Office 2002.
Well, I’ll confess know that I was never a fan of
WordPerfect – I cut my teeth of WordStar and its derivatives
before being frogmarched into MS word by force majeure.
So I asked for the
press pack, and the CD turned up. Sadly, the thing had been
screen printed with some ink that managed to pull the foil
from the CD. Fascinating, never seen such a thing before, and
I think I have managed to hoover most of the bits out of the
drive at last. I was about to give up when I saw a reference
to the product being showcased at www.runaware.com
- so I went along out of interest and was amazed to find that
thanks to SCO’s Tarantella Java-based remote Windows
terminal software (a sort of X Window interface for W2k) I was
able to wander around a copy of the product running somewhere
on a box in Stockholm.
Keeping the faith with
its presently claimed 22 million users, Wordperfect 2002 is a
thoroughly nice piece of software, and had I not got about 400
man years of investment in understanding the numerous foibles
and peculiarities of Microsoft Word, I would not hesitate to
use it. But the real Catch 22 for Corel is that although any
new user would thank you for steering them to this product,
such users usually have to rely on support service from
wizened old IT hacks like myself who cannot be arsed to learn
a new WP system at this stage of the game.
The only way Corel
will be able to make this work is to have a mode that throws
out all the really nice progressive user assistance (no
Clippie thank God) and just mimics MS Word as closely as
possible. The ability to import the defaults within MS Word
.dot templates would certainly be handy. Anyway, as an act of
civil disobedience, when I get my hands on a working Corel CD,
I will install the suite and force myself to switch from MS
Office. I will be regarded as quaint and eccentric by most
people I know, and I will occasionally forced to fire up MS
Word for some inescapable gotcha or other. But I will have
struck my first blow for freedom, and I expect to be proud of
it.
BACK
TO FEATURES
|